|
|
|
|
|
From the Book: Rethinking the Church
by James Emery White, I lifted the following paragraphs...some things to
THINK
about (please understand, I'm
not recommending anything, just offering some thought-provoking
paragraphs) Critical Importance of Structure to the Church A
church's
structure is crucial when it comes to rethinking the church because it
is a church's
structure that supports and facilitates the purposes and mission of a
church. Think of it functioning the way a skeleton serves a human
body C
it holds together and supports the working parts of the body in order to
enable them to function as a body. As
a result, a church's
structure can either serve the church or bring it to a standstill.
It can energize a community of faith or lead it toward ever
deepening levels of discouragement.
It can enable men and women to use their gifts and abilities for
the kingdom of God or tie the hands and frustrate the most dedicated
efforts of God's
people. Why?
Because the structure of any organization directly affects
morale, effectiveness, and unity. Structure in Today's
Church Morale,
effectiveness, and unity are key issues for the life of any church. Consequently, church structure must be evaluated in light of
whether it promotes morale, effectiveness, and unity. There are a wide number of approaches to church government,
from elder rule to a more congregationally based approach. Yet most forms of church government have three features that
dominate their structure: committees, policies, and majority rule. Concerns Regarding Committees There
are two concerns regarding committees and boards.
First, committees take people away from the frontlines of
ministry and move them into issues related to maintenance, such as
budgets and organizational matters.
Rick Warren observes that most churches take their brightest and best people and turn them into bureaucrats. Bill Hull likens it to a football game in which the
first-string players are not on the field but rather taking tickets,
selling programs, walking the aisles, working the refreshment booths,
and counting gate receipts. The
result is that people become separated from ministry.
They become involved not in the work of the church (ministry) but
in church work (administration). The
more people that are involved in maintenance decisions, the more you
waste their time, keep them from ministry, and create opportunities for
conflict. Maintenance work also conditions people to think that their
responsibility is fulfilled by simply voting on church business.
The difference between a committee and ministry is profound:
Committees
discuss it, but ministries do it. Committees
argue, ministries act. Committees
maintain, ministries minister. Committees
talk and consider, ministries serve and care.
Committees discuss needs, ministries meet needs. Committees
keep the people who are doing the ministry from making the decisions
about the ministry. Authority
and responsibility become separate from one another.
This is a recipe for poor decision making, not to mention low
morale. The individuals who are the most intimately involved in a
particular ministry are the best qualified to make the day in and out
decisions regarding that ministry.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||